This paper is published in Volume-7, Issue-3, 2021
Area
Commerce
Author
Dr. G. Lakshmi, Nivethitha S., Shebhani Shri A K, Vijayshree A.
Org/Univ
PSGR Krishnammal College for Women, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
Pub. Date
15 May, 2021
Paper ID
V7I3-1291
Publisher
Keywords
Cash flow, Financial, Performance, Decisions

Citationsacebook

IEEE
Dr. G. Lakshmi, Nivethitha S., Shebhani Shri A K, Vijayshree A.. Cash flow analysis of Khadim India Limited and Liberty Shoe Limited: A comparative study, International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology, www.IJARIIT.com.

APA
Dr. G. Lakshmi, Nivethitha S., Shebhani Shri A K, Vijayshree A. (2021). Cash flow analysis of Khadim India Limited and Liberty Shoe Limited: A comparative study. International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology, 7(3) www.IJARIIT.com.

MLA
Dr. G. Lakshmi, Nivethitha S., Shebhani Shri A K, Vijayshree A.. "Cash flow analysis of Khadim India Limited and Liberty Shoe Limited: A comparative study." International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology 7.3 (2021). www.IJARIIT.com.

Abstract

The analysis of the cash flow statement is an important part in the evaluation of a financial statements, in order to analyze its financial performance, position and thereby make informed decisions. The main focus of this study is to analyze the cash flow statement of KHADIM INDIA LIMITED and LIBERTY SHOES LIMITED. To analyze the same Mean, Cash Flow based Ratios and Trend Analysis were used as research tools. From the analysis of the companies for a period of 5 years since 2015 to 2020, it has been observed that the cash flow of both the companies are fluctuating over the period. Although both the companies had shown a good cash flow position throughout the observation, but certainly there is room for improvement in the forthcoming years. The overall study has revealed that the cash flows of Khadim India Limited is slightly at a better position when compared to Liberty Shoes Limited during the five-year comparison.
Paper PDF