This paper examines whether feminism on social media, despite its empowering appearance, is truly inclusive and accessible to all sections of society, or primarily serves the interests of privileged users. Framed around the concept of 'epistemic injustice,' the study explores how digital platforms like Instagram and TikTok may unintentionally exclude marginalized voices through tools such as algorithmic sorting, aesthetic bias, and engagement-driven content filtering. Key concepts like testimonial injustice, shadowbanning, and report bombing are used to highlight the structural barriers faced by Dalit, queer, disabled, and muslim women online. By analyzing these platforms, the paper questions whether digital feminism truly reaches and democratizes voices or simply echoes dominant narratives.