The study outlines the basic justifications for the necessity of conservation and the reasons it frequently falls short of its objectives. It highlights how a person's social background and upbringing significantly impact their feelings toward animals. For example, although people in the fashion or entertainment sectors may perceive animals as resources or props, hunters may see them as prey. These divergent viewpoints weaken the urgency of preserving animal life and obstruct coordinated conservation efforts. The suffering of animals kept in captivity, whether in zoos, laboratories, circuses, or on movie sets, is a significant issue that has been raised. It was said that being in captivity reduced innate instincts, increased physical and mental abnormalities, and created moral dilemmas. The fashion industry continues to use fur, leather, and exotic animal skins, despite the availability of contemporary substitutes such as synthetic materials. According to the publication, this is now a luxury decision that leads to needless cruelty rather than a necessity. The abstract discusses the widespread use of animal experimentation and dissection in research and education, highlighting the associated ethical concerns and the availability of alternatives. It also highlights the mistreatment of animals in the entertainment industry, particularly on film shoots and in theme parks, where animals are often treated as disposable. The abstract discusses the widespread use of animal experimentation and dissection in research and education, highlighting the associated ethical concerns and the availability of alternatives. It also highlights the mistreatment of animals in the entertainment industry, particularly on film shoots and in theme parks, where animals are often treated as disposable.