This paper is published in Volume-11, Issue-5, 2025
Area
Computer Science
Author
Ifeoma Eleweke
Org/Univ
Westcliff University, California, USA
Pub. Date
14 October, 2025
Paper ID
V11I5-1190
Publisher
Keywords
AI Infrastructure, Cloud Security, Infrastructure as Code (IaC) Security, Code and Data Integrity, National Cybersecurity.

Citationsacebook

IEEE
Ifeoma Eleweke. Fortifying AI Infrastructure: Securing Code, Configuration, and Integrity in National Systems, International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology, www.IJARIIT.com.

APA
Ifeoma Eleweke (2025). Fortifying AI Infrastructure: Securing Code, Configuration, and Integrity in National Systems. International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology, 11(5) www.IJARIIT.com.

MLA
Ifeoma Eleweke. "Fortifying AI Infrastructure: Securing Code, Configuration, and Integrity in National Systems." International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology 11.5 (2025). www.IJARIIT.com.

Abstract

The rapid adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) on cloud platforms, such as AWS and Azure, has introduced critical security vulnerabilities across various national sectors, including defense, healthcare, and energy. While these environments deliver scalable intelligence, they also expand the attack surface, exposing misconfigured resources, unverified code, and weak identity controls. Recent breaches, including Capital One’s AWS data exposure, Tesla’s compromised Kubernetes console, and Microsoft’s AI dataset leak, demonstrate how cloud-hosted AI pipelines can be weaponized through insecure defaults, leaked credentials, and permissive access roles. This study analyzes prominent security incidents alongside current research on cloud and AI threats to identify recurring weaknesses in configuration management, secret handling, and model integrity. The findings highlight how attackers exploit these gaps to steal data, engage in cryptojacking, and gain unauthorized access to AI models. To address these risks, the paper proposes a framework for fortifying AI infrastructure that emphasizes: (1) zero-trust identity and access management, (2) secure coding and model lifecycle practices, (3) automated configuration scanning, and (4) continuous policy enforcement. The results underscore that AI infrastructure should be treated as national critical infrastructure, warranting rigorous standards and proactive defense measures. Without systematic hardening, AI pipelines are high-value targets for cybercriminals and nation-state actors, posing a threat to public safety and national security.